3 Ways to Contend With Incorrect Family Tree Data Online

Posted on by

I remember the joy from years ago as new family history data became available online. Being able to search online was a cinch, so much easier than planning vacations around trips to libraries and historical societies. However the joy was dampened whenever I’d stumble upon an online pedigree that was foggy or completely incorrect. Almost ten years ago I became so frustrated with online genealogy errors I started my own surname website (Tennessee Pryors). Starting a website may not be your cup of tea, but there are three things you can do now to address incorrect data online and make a cleaner investigation path for future genealogy buffs.

1. Put up your own data – Many of the top genealogy websites give you the ability to post your own data. The LDS FamilySearch.org website allows visitors (church membership not required) to submit their own family data. Subscription websites like Ancestry.com offers the user the feature of adding multiple family trees, and even posting documents, photos, and other documentation. Genealogy.com also provides space to posting your own genealogy and family tree. Any of the community areas and message board areas of genealogy sites also allows you to post not just queries, but your own data and recent genealogy discoveries.

2. Ask information to be changed– I’ve communicated with other researchers with mixed results. Some are amiable to changing their family tree or posted data when provided with new data backed with good source information. Others are committed to information passed down from relatives, incorrect information from accepted genealogy books or other authorities, or in rare cases they are unable to login and access the data to makes changes.

3. Add comments– My personal favorite is to comment where ever the opportunity is given. The good news is that commenting is allowed in a multitude of places on the web. Ancestry.com understands that users have something to contribute and allows comments: add a comment to a census record, put a note on family tree, and identify name variations and transcription errors. Book reviews on Google Books or Ancestry.com is also a method of attaching your opinion and alternative information.

The Internet is always increasing in opportunities for an interactive genealogy experience. That means whether you’re an expert or a novice you can get involved. It’s time to take advantage of the opportunities to participate and help to increase the accuracy of online genealogy data.

Copyright 2010, Vanessa Wood


Internet Genealogy: Lost Ancestors – 5 Strategies to Find Missing People on Internet Records

Posted on by

I’ve hit my share of “brickwalls” in the research of my own family tree. What I’ve learned is that our ancestors were much more mobile than we ever thought. To help you in your hunt for lost ancestors and the “missing links” that will solve your genealogy mysteries I’m sharing the strategies that have led to finding people you may think were dead or never counted on public records.

1. County Lines: The US was a rapidly developing country beginning in the 19th century. Geographic features sometimes blurred where one county began and another ended and at other times counties were added as governmental districts were reassessed and towns were incorporated or expanded. Whatever the reason don’t write off the potential that an ancestor may be in a different county than expected or that records may exist in multiple counties.

Tip: Look in neighboring counties and larger towns that may have grown in distant counties. I found more than one ancestor counted twice (and in two different counties) on the census records!

2. Migration: It’s known from even grade school history classes that there was a tremendous migration to the western United States and territories. When an ancestor goes missing from the records it’s a good practice to look in the records of adjoining states or newly opened territories. Learning when territories were opened for homesteading and where land was given for military service also helps in tracking down elusive ancestors.

Tip: Use Wikipedia to find dates counties were formed, territories were opened, and when states were granted statehood.

3. Reverse Migration: An avenue of genealogy research that is often forgotten is reverse migration-when the land wasn’t good for farming or the conditions were too harsh, or homesickness became too much, our ancestors at times went back home or returned to the East. My personal favorite example is the 1860 Census of Lee County, VA. The census taker not only was meticulous about listing the birth state of every resident, but also listed their birth county. The number of people born in Eastern Tennessee to parents who were natives of Lee County is fascinating.

Tip: Don’t rule out people of similar names but born in different states as possible kin to your ancestors. That person born in Missouri who shows up on a Virginia census may be a missing connection!

4. Traveling: We shouldn’t assume that traveling began with the invention the jumbo jet! I’ve found ancestors in New York hotels and on ship manifests either going to or returning from trips abroad. An ancestor’s occupation may have called for travel. For example I found people elected to political office living far from home in Washington, DC. I found one family who appeared to have disappeared on a UK Census!

Tip: Even when you’re convinced an ancestor was a non-traveling farmer, search border crossings, ship passenger lists, and even foreign census records-you may be in for quite a surprise!

5. Civil War: The War Between the States was the first war which caused a significant change in many of our ancestors’ locations. Troops were moved from North to South, and South to North, and from one side of the country to another. Crops were destroyed along with livelihoods causing families to move from homesteads. The African American population comprised largely of recently freed slaves, were first enumerated by name on the 1870 census after many had left the plantations where they lived prior to the War. I found one ancestor from Tennessee who was captured by the Union army in the North and remained there after his release.

Tip: When researching an ancestor who served in the Civil War be sure to look at their date and place of discharge as it can be a clue to where they may have stayed after the War.

Don’t give up. With perseverance you’ll find who you are looking for where you least expect to find them.

Copyright 2010, Vanessa Wood

John Hughes Pryor of Goochland Co., VA and Rutherford Co., TN

Summer Article Series

I’m taking time off from the website and blogging in July and August. I work as a web designer and internet consultant and will be enjoying some vacation time and time to write my stash of blog articles for months to come. However there will be plenty to read here on the Tennessee Pryors blog! I’m running a series of blog posts of Internet Genealogy tips, the same tips I use to find all those lost Pryors! So encourage your research friends and family to subscribe to the blog RSS feed or get email updates through Feedburner.

John Hughes Pryor of Goochland Co., VA and Rutherford Co., TN

John Hughes Pryor is one of the sketchier Pryors. I assume he was a fine human being, but the information about him is sparse… and sketchy.

It’s believed that he was the son of William Pryor born about 1785 and Elizabeth Hughes.  John married Sallie Smith in 1802 in Goochland County and was on the Goochland County Census in 1820. John was the grandson of Col. William Pryor and the great-grandson of Col. Samuel Pryor who were the patriarchs of large Pryor families and a long lineage of Virginia Pryors.

On the 1830 Census he was recorded as Jno.  H. Pryor in Rutherford County, TN. He moved his family to Williamson County some time before 1840. The Minute Book Genealogy of Williamson County , Tennessee 1799-1865 by Albert L. Lawson contains a reference to John Pyor: “1834 (13/381) In the case of Clouston vs Healy & Pigot there is mention of lands on the waters of West Harpeth bounded on the north by the heirs of Pryor and in the waters of Liepers Fork of West Harpeth adjoining the lands of John Pryor on the east.” So if John Pryor was in Williamson County in 1834, and most researchers date his death as 1841, who were the “heirs of Pryor”? Were they the heirs of another Pryor who was deceased? Who was this other Pryor?

Siblings

John Hughes Pryor had 5 known siblings. His sister Judith Neville Pryor b. 1786 married Fonatine Duke in 1808 in VA. She was on the 1850 and 1860 Census in McNairy Co., TN. Another sister,  Martha “Patsy”, married Robert Meriweather and was still in Goochland County in 1850. Robert Meriweather may have been a distant cousin, in that John Hughes Pryor’s aunt Frances Morton Pryor had also married a Meriweather.  A mental note should be made that Meriweather Lewis, half of Lewis and Clark was from the Meriweather family, was from the same area of Virginia as these Pryors and chose a Pryor as part of his expedition (Sgt. Nathaniel Pryor). While I can’t prove a connection between John Huges Pryor and the explorer, these facts may indicate that these families traveled in similar social circles

Looking at the children of John Hughes Pryor I came across family trees on Ancestry.com with conflicting information.

Sons

Allen Pryor born 1802.  I suspect the family trees that include Allen as a son of John Pryor have drawn their information from the census records that show an Allen Pryor in Rutherford County on the 1820 Census. The Allen on the 1820 Census was born between 1775 and 1794. He appears to be a contemporary of John Hughes Pryor, not a son. If John Hughes Pryor is the same John on the 1810 and 1820 Census in Goochland County, he had no sons recorded on either census.

Daughters

John Pryor of Goochland County has six younger females living in his household in 1820. Six daughters? Holy cow!

1. Louisa A. Pryor born 1800 in Virginia. She married Abner C. Sublett in about 1829, so Louisa would have been one of the daughters in the Pryor household on the 1820 Census.  They are on the 1850 though 1880 in Rutherford County, TN. Louisa’s children were named Susan Amanda, Valentine A., John C., Sarah J., and Horace A.

2. Mary Jane Pryor. Born 1808 in Virginia. She married William James Hargrove in 1826 in McNairy Co., TN.  Their children were Benjamin Franklin, Sarah Frances, John Hugh, James Monroe, Amanda, Mary L., Thomas Caldwell, and Robert Ezrell.  Mary and her family were on the 1850 Census in McNairy County, not too far from her aunt Judith Pryor Duke, a sister of John Hughes Pryor.  The Hargroves and the Dukes appear to be educated, town-dwellers as William Hargrove was a grocer and a physician was living in the Duke household. William Hargrove was recorded on the same page as John Hughes Pryor on the 1840 Census in Williamson Co., TN.

Mary was recorded on the 1860 Census in Hardin County, TN as “Mary Hargroves”, living with children Mary L, Thomas C., and Robert L.  Living near her are also her children Amanda Hargrove Cowan, and John H. Hargrove. Despite one Ancestry Tree that states Mary died 1866 in Norwoodville, Sevier Co., AR—Mary and her children were still in Hardin Co., TN on the 1870 Census.  By 1880 Mary’s children and their families were in Sevier County, AR.

My conclusion is that Mary Jane is of the right social status and lived in the right geography to be a daughter of John Hughes Pryor.

3. Amanda F. Pryor born 1809 in Virginia. Married William P. Batte in 1827 in Rutherford County. They are on the 1850 through 1870 Census in Sumner Co., TN.  There is a William D. Batey born between 1800 – 1810 on the 1840 Census in Rutherford County. The 1850 Census reveals their children were named Augustus Washington, William B., Elizabeth P., and James H (James Hughes?).  Amanda’s age, place of birth, and where she lived strongly suggests she may be one of John Hughes Pryor’s daughters.

4. Henrietta Lee Smith Pryor born 1815 in Virginia. Henrietta married Goodwin Davis. I haven’t found them on the 1850 Census, however they were on the 1860 Census in Bedford County, TN. Their known children are Able, Archibald, William, John Louis, Alabama, Robert Young, Sarah Louisiana, Mary Margaret, Valentine Sublett, Martha Tennessee, Jane Washington.  Mrs. H. Davis is recorded directly under John Hughes Pryor on the 1840 Census in Williamson Co., TN. I believe the names of her children connects her to Louisa Pryor Sublett and her position on the census near John Hughes Pryor is further evidence of the relationship.

5. Sophia Weston Pryor born 1818 in Virginia. Sophia married Ezra Keyser born in PA. They married in 1838 in Rutherford Co., TN. Their children were Sally and Mary R. They are on the 1850 Census in Fulton Co., KY and in 1870 through 1880 they are in Gonzales Co., TX.  Not conclusive, the daughter named Sally, could have been named for her mother Sallie Smith.  I’ve wondered if Ezra Keyser was related to Joseph Kizer who filed an assault charge against Thornton Pryor in Robertson County in 1814. There’s also a Keyser connection to the Phereba Pryor who was living with Spicy Taylor Pryor in Overton County, TN in 1850– when she was recorded on the 1860 Census in Sumner County she was living with a John Keyser and a Silas Ryan born in PA. Could there be a connection between the Pryors in Sumner County and Overton County Pryors with Sophia and perhaps John Hughes Pryor?

6. Elizabeth Smith Pryor born 1808 in Virginia. Married to Isaac Rainey.

7. Martha Pryor born 1812 in Virginia. Martha married Benjamin Potter.  They are on the 1850 Census in Rutherford County, TN. Their children were named John and Amanda, names that could follow names in her own family: father named John Pryor and a sister named Amanda.

8. Virginia W. Pryor born 1823 in Tennessee. Virginia married Thomas W. Hill in Williamson Co., TN in 1842. They are on the 1860 through 1870 Census in Wayne Co., IL. They are on the 1880 Census in Philips Co., KS. Their children were named Adelia, Sarah C., John G., Mary J., Basil, Oscar James, and Laura M.

Since all of these women who researchers suggest as daughters appear to have married after 1820, there are more suggested daughters than female children in the Pryor household on the 1820 Census.  Unfortunately we don’t have enough information to draw conclusions: either two of the women are not his daughters, they may have been living with relatives in 1820, or attending a private school, or other scenario.

Joseph A. Pryor of Greene Co., MO

Thank you to Glen Pryor who has ID’d Joseph A. Pryor of Greene Co., MO as the son of William H. Pryor.

Category: Genealogy | Tags:

The Tennessee Ancestry Certificate Program

Posted on by

I thought you might be interested…

The Tennessee Ancestry Certificate Program is sponsored by The Tennessee Genealogical Society to recognize and honor early settlers who helped shape the great state of Tennessee. Persons wishing to place their ancestors in this roll of honor are invited to submit an application with supporting documents or other evidence that proves their prime ancestor lived in Tennessee or the area that became Tennessee before 1880. Family charts or computer printouts are not considered sufficient proof.

Attractive hand lettered certificates suitable for framing are issued each person whose application meets program specifications. The certificates are inscribed with the prime ancestor’s name, when and where he or she settled in Tennessee, and the applicant’s name.

Using these certificates, two books, Tennessee Settlers and Their Descendants, Volumes I and 2 have been published.  These books can be purchased from the TNGS.

Order forms for the books and application forms and instruction sheets for the certificates are available at www.tngs.org, or by mail at: The Tennessee Genealogical Society, PO Box 381824, Germantown, TN, 38183-1824.

Newsletter January 2010, Vol. 16, Number 1: The Tennessee Genealogical Society

To use the resources on the TNGS website, use the menu on the left side of the screen and click on “search”.

Category: News