The kids are back in school and it’s time to get back to Pryor research.
Sometimes mixed up family lines help to solve each other. I recently was looking at the Ancestry DNA (autosomal) results for a test kit that matches one of my own. This tester is descended from the line of Allen L Pryor of Sumner County, TN through his son William. The interesting thing about William is that he married a woman who was the grand-daughter of a Pryor: Absolem Bostic Pryor born about 1797 in NC.
My tester matches to my kit as approximately a 5th cousin which works out correctly on paper if Allen L Pryor is our common relative. If we were related also through the line of Absolem Bostic Pryor, then this cousin who tested would have more Pryor DNA than expected.
Surnames and geography don’t prove out a family tree. I’ve seen some sloppy Ancestry trees where people see a surname in a geographic area and wrongly assume that everyone using the name in their family tree must be related. Or even when someone finds their ancestor in one state and wrongly assumes that someone living in another state can’t be related.
So, if the DNA doesn’t point to a connection between these two Pryor families and Absolem has been placed in family trees that stem from “North Carolina” Pryors that haven’t converged with the line that includes Allen L Pryor, then I’d have to suggest that unless there’s a story of an adoption or other story that can explain the DNA — these two lines aren’t related.